Home Comparison Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs Radeon HD 2600 XT X2

Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs Radeon HD 2600 XT X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2600 XT X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
2184 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris +2883%
5728
Radeon HD 2600 XT X2
192

Graphics Card

Apr 2017
Release Date
Jul 2007
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1750 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

36
Compute Units
3
2304
Shading Units
120
144
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.400 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
192.0 GFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
Unknown
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
RV630
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
65 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
© 2025 - TopCPU.net