Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs Radeon RX 6900 XT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 6900 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Lower TDP (250W vs 300W)
Radeon RX 6900 XT 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2250MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
5728
Radeon RX 6900 XT
+302%
23040
Graphics Card
Apr 2017
Release Date
Oct 2020
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2250 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
36
Compute Units
80
2304
Shading Units
5120
144
TMUs
320
32
ROPs
128
-
RT Cores
80
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB
Theoretical Performance
39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
288.0 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
720.0 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
46.08 TFLOPS
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.04 TFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1440 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
300W
600 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Ellesmere
GPU Name
Navi 21
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
Navi 21 XTX
(215-121000167)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
7 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
6.5
