Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs Radeon X1600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 512MB VRAM Radeon X1600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Radeon X1600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (27W vs 250W)
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 2017
Release Date
Jan 2007
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
36
Compute Units
-
2304
Shading Units
-
144
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.540 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.540 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
250W
TDP
27W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Ellesmere
GPU Name
RV516
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
R500
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
UMC
14 nm
Process Size
80 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.7
Shader Model
3.0
