Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 32GB VRAM RTX 5000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 5000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2550MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
10496 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
5728
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
+1039%
65280
Graphics Card
Apr 2017
Release Date
Aug 2023
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1155 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2550 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
36
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
100
2304
Shading Units
12800
144
TMUs
400
32
ROPs
176
-
Tensor Cores
400
-
RT Cores
100
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
72 MB
Theoretical Performance
39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
448.8 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1020 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
65.28 TFLOPS
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
65.28 TFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1020 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
250W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
Ellesmere
GPU Name
AD102
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
AD102
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
5 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.7
Shader Model
6.7
