Radeon Pro Vega 56 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega 56 and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Pro Vega 56 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (402.4GB/s vs 288.0GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 7% (1335MHz vs 1250MHz)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Vega 56
+118%
8960
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
4101
Blender
Radeon Pro Vega 56
531
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
+63%
870
Graphics Card
Aug 2017
Release Date
Apr 2019
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1138 MHz
Base Clock
1140 MHz
1250 MHz
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
786 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
6GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR6
2048bit
Memory Bus
192bit
402.4GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s
Render Config
56
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
3584
Shading Units
1536
224
TMUs
96
64
ROPs
48
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
Theoretical Performance
80.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.08 GPixel/s
280.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.2 GTexel/s
17.92 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.202 TFLOPS
8.960 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.101 TFLOPS
560.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
128.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
210W
TDP
Unknown
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Vega 10
GPU Name
TU116
Vega 10 XL
(215-0894216)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 5.0
Architecture
Turing
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
12 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.7