Home Comparison Radeon Pro Vega 56 vs RTX A2000 Max Q

Radeon Pro Vega 56 vs RTX A2000 Max Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega 56 and 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Radeon Pro Vega 56 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 4% (1250MHz vs 1207MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (402.4GB/s vs 176.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
RTX A2000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
Lower TDP (95W vs 210W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Vega 56 +44%
8960
RTX A2000 Max Q
6180

Graphics Card

Aug 2017
Release Date
Apr 2021
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
Ampere-MW
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1138 MHz
Base Clock
682 MHz
1250 MHz
Boost Clock
1207 MHz
786 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR6
2048bit
Memory Bus
128bit
402.4GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

56
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
20
3584
Shading Units
2560
224
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

80.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.94 GPixel/s
280.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.56 GTexel/s
17.92 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.180 TFLOPS
8.960 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.180 TFLOPS
560.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
96.56 GFLOPS

Board Design

210W
TDP
95W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
GA107
Vega 10 XL (215-0894216)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 5.0
Architecture
Ampere
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
Samsung
14 nm
Process Size
8 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net