Radeon Pro W5700X vs GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro W5700X and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Pro W5700X 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2040MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
2320 additional rendering cores
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (204W vs 205W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W5700X
+1374%
10440
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
708
Graphics Card
Dec 2019
Release Date
Jan 2009
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1243 MHz
Base Clock
-
2040 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1242 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
159.0GB/s
Render Config
40
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
2560
Shading Units
240
160
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
32
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
130.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.74 GPixel/s
326.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
20.89 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.44 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
708.5 GFLOPS
652.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
88.56 GFLOPS
Board Design
205W
TDP
204W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x HDMI 2.1
4x Thunderbolt
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Navi 10
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
G200-350-B3
RDNA 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
55 nm
10.3 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
251 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.5
Shader Model
4.0
