Radeon Pro W5700X vs GeForce GTX 295
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro W5700X and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Pro W5700X 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2040MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
2320 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (205W vs 289W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W5700X
+1651%
10440
GeForce GTX 295
596
Graphics Card
Dec 2019
Release Date
Jan 2009
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1243 MHz
Base Clock
-
2040 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
40
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
2560
Shading Units
240
160
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
28
4 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
Theoretical Performance
130.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
326.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.08 GTexel/s
20.89 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.44 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
596.2 GFLOPS
652.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
74.52 GFLOPS
Board Design
205W
TDP
289W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 2.1
4x Thunderbolt
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Navi 10
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
G200-401-B3
RDNA 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
55 nm
10.3 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
251 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.5
Shader Model
4.0
