Home Comparison Radeon Pro W5700X vs Radeon R9 280X2

Radeon Pro W5700X vs Radeon R9 280X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro W5700X and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Radeon Pro W5700X 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 104% (2040MHz vs 1000MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 288.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (205W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W5700X +154%
10440
Radeon R9 280X2
4096

Graphics Card

Dec 2019
Release Date
Unknown
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1243 MHz
Base Clock
950 MHz
2040 MHz
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

40
Compute Units
32
2560
Shading Units
2048
160
TMUs
128
64
ROPs
32
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

130.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.00 GPixel/s
326.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
20.89 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.44 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
652.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS

Board Design

205W
TDP
375W
550 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
3x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 10
GPU Name
Tahiti
-
GPU Variant
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
RDNA 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
10.3 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
251 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.5
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net