Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics vs GMA X3500
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics and 0System Shared VRAM GMA X3500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock600MHz
128 additional rendering cores
GMA X3500 's Advantages
Lower TDP (13W vs 15W)
Score
Graphics Card
Jun 2016
Release Date
Aug 2007
Stoney Ridge
Generation
GMA Graphics
Integrated
Type
Integrated
IGP
Bus Interface
FSB
Clock Speeds
200 MHz
Base Clock
-
600 MHz
Boost Clock
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
128
Shading Units
-
8
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
1
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
667.0 MPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.336 GTexel/s
153.6 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
153.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
9.600 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
15W
TDP
13W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Stoney
GPU Name
Bearlake
-
GPU Variant
Bearlake (G35)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Generation 4.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
90 nm
1.2 billion
Transistors
Unknown
125 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
9.0c
4.6
OpenGL
2.0
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
6.3
Shader Model
3.0
