Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics vs Radeon Graphics 320SP
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics and 0System Shared VRAM Radeon Graphics 320SP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Graphics 320SP 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 133% (1400MHz vs 600MHz)
192 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics
154
Radeon Graphics 320SP
+481%
896
Graphics Card
Jun 2016
Release Date
Jan 2020
Stoney Ridge
Generation
Renoir
Integrated
Type
Integrated
IGP
Bus Interface
IGP
Clock Speeds
200 MHz
Base Clock
400 MHz
600 MHz
Boost Clock
1400 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
2
Compute Units
5
128
Shading Units
320
8
TMUs
20
4
ROPs
8
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.20 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.00 GTexel/s
153.6 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1.792 TFLOPS
153.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
896.0 GFLOPS
9.600 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
56.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
15W
TDP
15W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Stoney
GPU Name
Renoir
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 5.1
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.2 billion
Transistors
9.8 billion
125 mm²
Die Size
156 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
6.3
Shader Model
6.4
