Radeon R5 M330 vs RTX A2000 Max Q 8 GB
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 M330 and 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q 8 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R5 M330 's Advantages
Lower TDP (18W vs 95W)
RTX A2000 Max Q 8 GB 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 14% (1177MHz vs 1030MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
2240 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 M330
659
RTX A2000 Max Q 8 GB
+814%
6026
Graphics Card
May 2015
Release Date
Apr 2021
Crystal System
Generation
Ampere-MW
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
955 MHz
Base Clock
607 MHz
1030 MHz
Boost Clock
1177 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s
Render Config
5
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
20
320
Shading Units
2560
20
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
8.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
56.50 GPixel/s
20.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
94.16 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.026 TFLOPS
659.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.026 TFLOPS
41.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
94.16 GFLOPS
Board Design
18W
TDP
95W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Exo
GPU Name
GA107
Exo PRO
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.69 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
56 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
5.0
Shader Model
6.8