Radeon R7 240 OEM vs FireStream 9250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 OEM and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R7 240 OEM 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock780MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (63.55GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
480 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 240 OEM
499
FireStream 9250
+100%
1000
Graphics Card
Nov 2013
Release Date
Jun 2008
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
730 MHz
Base Clock
-
780 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s
Render Config
5
Compute Units
10
320
Shading Units
800
20
TMUs
40
8
ROPs
16
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
499.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
31.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Oland
GPU Name
RV770
-
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
5.1
Shader Model
4.1
