Radeon R7 240 OEM vs Radeon R9 FURY X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 OEM and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R7 240 OEM 's Advantages
Boost Clock780MHz
Lower TDP (50W vs 275W)
Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
3776 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 240 OEM
499
Radeon R9 FURY X
+1623%
8602
Graphics Card
Nov 2013
Release Date
Jun 2015
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
730 MHz
Base Clock
-
780 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
5
Compute Units
64
320
Shading Units
4096
20
TMUs
256
8
ROPs
64
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
67.20 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
268.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.602 TFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.602 TFLOPS
31.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
537.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
275W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a
3x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Oland
GPU Name
Fiji
-
GPU Variant
Fiji XT C8
(215-0862040)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.3
