Radeon R7 250 OEM vs FireStream 9170
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R7 250 OEM 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
64 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 105W)
FireStream 9170 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.33GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250 OEM
+62%
806
FireStream 9170
497
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Nov 2007
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
802 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
51.33GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
4
384
Shading Units
320
24
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
16
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
8.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
806.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
50.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS
Board Design
65W
TDP
105W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Oland
GPU Name
RV670
Oland XT
(215-0837000)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
5.1
Shader Model
4.1
