Radeon R7 250 OEM vs GeForce RTX 4090 D
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM and 24GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4090 D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R7 250 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 425W)
GeForce RTX 4090 D 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 140% (2520MHz vs 1050MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1008GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
14208 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250 OEM
806
GeForce RTX 4090 D
+9024%
73540
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Dec 2023
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
2280 MHz
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
2520 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1313 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
24GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6X
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
1008GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
114
384
Shading Units
14592
24
TMUs
456
8
ROPs
176
-
Tensor Cores
456
-
RT Cores
114
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
72 MB
Theoretical Performance
8.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
443.5 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1149 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
73.54 TFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
73.54 TFLOPS
50.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1149 GFLOPS
Board Design
65W
TDP
425W
250 W
Suggested PSU
800 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
Oland
GPU Name
AD102
Oland XT
(215-0837000)
GPU Variant
AD102-250-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7