Radeon R7 360 vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360 and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 103% (2130MHz vs 1050MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 360
1613
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+643%
12000
3DMark Time Spy
Radeon R7 360
1371
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+494%
8147
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Radeon R7 360
517
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+596%
3601
Graphics Card
Jun 2015
Release Date
Feb 2024
Pirate Islands
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
1620 MHz
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
22
768
Shading Units
2816
48
TMUs
88
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
1.613 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
100.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
70W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Tobago
GPU Name
AD107
Tobago PRO
(215-0875010)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.3
Shader Model
6.7
