Radeon R7 M350 vs Radeon R7 A265
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R7 M350 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 A265 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R7 M350 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 23% (1015MHz vs 825MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Radeon R7 A265 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 M350
+23%
779
Radeon R7 A265
633
Graphics Card
May 2015
Release Date
Jan 2014
Gem System(R7 M300)
Generation
All-In-One
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
725 MHz
1015 MHz
Boost Clock
825 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
6
384
Shading Units
384
24
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
8
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
8.120 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
24.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.80 GTexel/s
779.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
779.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
633.6 GFLOPS
48.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
39.60 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
Unknown
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
Graphics Processor
Meso
GPU Name
Opal
Meso XT
(216-0864018)
GPU Variant
Opal XT
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.55 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
125 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2.170
6.5
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)
