Home Comparison Radeon R7 M350 vs RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

Radeon R7 M350 vs RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R7 M350 and 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 66% (1680MHz vs 1015MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
9344 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 M350
779
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 +4096%
32690

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Mar 2023
Gem System(R7 M300)
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
1015 MHz
Boost Clock
1680 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
76
384
Shading Units
9728
24
TMUs
304
8
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
304
-
RT Cores
76
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
64 MB

Theoretical Performance

8.120 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
188.2 GPixel/s
24.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
510.7 GTexel/s
779.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
32.69 TFLOPS
779.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.69 TFLOPS
48.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
510.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
150W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Meso
GPU Name
AD103
Meso XT (216-0864018)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.55 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
125 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.5
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net