Radeon R9 270 1024SP vs CMP 50HX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 270 1024SP and 10GB VRAM CMP 50HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 270 1024SP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
CMP 50HX 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 67% (1545MHz vs 925MHz)
More VRAM (10GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (560.0GB/s vs 153.6GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 270 1024SP
1894
CMP 50HX
+484%
11070
Graphics Card
Mar 2015
Release Date
Jun 2021
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x4
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
1350 MHz
925 MHz
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
10GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
320bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
560.0GB/s
Render Config
16
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
56
1024
Shading Units
3584
64
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
5 MB
Theoretical Performance
29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
123.6 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
296.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.15 TFLOPS
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.07 TFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
346.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Pitcairn
GPU Name
TU102
Pitcairn PRO
(215-0828062)
GPU Variant
TU102-100-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.8