Radeon R9 270 1024SP vs FirePro RG220A
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 270 1024SP and 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 270 1024SP 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (153.6GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
944 additional rendering cores
FirePro RG220A 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 270 1024SP
+2267%
1894
FirePro RG220A
80
Graphics Card
Mar 2015
Release Date
May 2010
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro Remote
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
16
Compute Units
1
1024
Shading Units
80
64
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
35W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Pitcairn
GPU Name
M93
Pitcairn PRO
(215-0828062)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.242 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
73 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
5.1
Shader Model
4.1
