Radeon R9 270 1024SP vs Radeon Instinct MI300A
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 270 1024SP and 192GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI300A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 270 1024SP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 750W)
Radeon Instinct MI300A 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 127% (2100MHz vs 925MHz)
More VRAM (192GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 153.6GB/s)
18432 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 270 1024SP
1894
Radeon Instinct MI300A
+4214%
81720
Graphics Card
Mar 2015
Release Date
Dec 2023
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
925 MHz
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
2525 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
10.3TB/s
Render Config
16
Compute Units
304
1024
Shading Units
19456
64
TMUs
1216
32
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1216
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
L3 Cache
256 MB
Theoretical Performance
29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2554 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
653.7 TFLOPS
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
81.72 TFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.72 TFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
750W
450 W
Suggested PSU
1150 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Pitcairn
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram
Pitcairn PRO
(215-0828062)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
153 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
5.1
Shader Model
N/A
