Home Comparison Radeon R9 270 1024SP vs Voodoo4 2 4200 PCI 32 MB

Radeon R9 270 1024SP vs Voodoo4 2 4200 PCI 32 MB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 270 1024SP and 32MB VRAM Voodoo4 2 4200 PCI 32 MB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Radeon R9 270 1024SP 's Advantages
Boost Clock925MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 32GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (153.6GB/s vs 2.656GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Voodoo4 2 4200 PCI 32 MB 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 150W)

Score

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
Unknown
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Voodoo4-2
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 4x

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
166 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
32MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
2.656GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
-
64
TMUs
2
32
ROPs
2
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
332.0 MPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
332.0 MTexel/s
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
15W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
VSA-101
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
Daytona (355-0025-221)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Voodoo Scalable
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
180 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.014 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
112 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
6.0
4.6
OpenGL
1.1
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
5.1
Shader Model
-
© 2025 - TopCPU.net