Radeon R9 280 vs FirePro 2460 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 and 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock933MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
1712 additional rendering cores
FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 200W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280
+4080%
3344
FirePro 2460 Multi View
80
Graphics Card
Mar 2014
Release Date
Apr 2010
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
827 MHz
Base Clock
-
933 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s
Render Config
28
Compute Units
1
1792
Shading Units
80
112
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
29.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
104.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
3.344 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
836.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
200W
TDP
17W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
2x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Tahiti
GPU Name
Cedar
Tahiti PRO3
(215-0821330)
GPU Variant
Cedar GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
5.1
Shader Model
5.0
