Radeon R9 280 vs FirePro V8750
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V8750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock933MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
992 additional rendering cores
FirePro V8750 's Advantages
Lower TDP (151W vs 200W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280
+178%
3344
FirePro V8750
1200
Graphics Card
Mar 2014
Release Date
Jul 2008
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
827 MHz
Base Clock
-
933 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s
Render Config
28
Compute Units
10
1792
Shading Units
800
112
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
29.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
104.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
3.344 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
836.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
200W
TDP
151W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
2x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.0
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Tahiti
GPU Name
RV770
Tahiti PRO3
(215-0821330)
GPU Variant
RV770 XT
(215-0669049)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
5.1
Shader Model
4.1
