Radeon R9 280 vs GeForce GTX 750 GM206
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 GM206 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
GeForce GTX 750 GM206 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 33% (1239MHz vs 933MHz)
Lower TDP (60W vs 200W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280
+163%
3344
GeForce GTX 750 GM206
1269
3DMark Time Spy
Radeon R9 280
+71%
2009
GeForce GTX 750 GM206
1169
Graphics Card
Mar 2014
Release Date
Nov 2015
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
827 MHz
Base Clock
1087 MHz
933 MHz
Boost Clock
1239 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s
Render Config
28
Compute Units
-
1792
Shading Units
512
112
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
29.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.65 GPixel/s
104.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.65 GTexel/s
3.344 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1269 GFLOPS
836.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
39.65 GFLOPS
Board Design
200W
TDP
60W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
2x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Tahiti
GPU Name
GM206
Tahiti PRO3
(215-0821330)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4