Radeon R9 280 vs H200 NVL
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 and 141GB VRAM H200 NVL to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
Lower TDP (200W vs 600W)
H200 NVL 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 91% (1785MHz vs 933MHz)
More VRAM (141GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4.89TB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
15104 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280
3344
H200 NVL
+1703%
60320
Graphics Card
Mar 2014
Release Date
Nov 2024
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Server Hopper
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
827 MHz
Base Clock
1365 MHz
933 MHz
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1593 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
141GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3e
384bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
4.89TB/s
Render Config
28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
132
1792
Shading Units
16896
112
TMUs
528
32
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
528
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
50 MB
Theoretical Performance
29.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.84 GPixel/s
104.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
942.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
241.3 TFLOPS
3.344 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
60.32 TFLOPS
836.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.16 TFLOPS
Board Design
200W
TDP
600W
550 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
1x DVI
2x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
Tahiti
GPU Name
GH100
Tahiti PRO3
(215-0821330)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Hopper
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
80 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
814 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
9.0
5.1
Shader Model
N/A
