Radeon R9 280 vs Moore Threads MTT S1000M
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 and 4GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S1000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
Boost Clock933MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Moore Threads MTT S1000M 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (35W vs 200W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280
+63%
3344
Moore Threads MTT S1000M
2048
Graphics Card
Mar 2014
Release Date
Jul 2022
Volcanic Islands
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
827 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
933 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
28
Compute Units
8
1792
Shading Units
1024
112
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
64
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
29.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
104.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
64.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.096 TFLOPS
3.344 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.048 TFLOPS
836.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
32.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
200W
TDP
35W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
2x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Tahiti
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
Tahiti PRO3
(215-0821330)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
Unknown
352 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.4
5.1
Shader Model
6.5
