Home Comparison Radeon R9 280 vs MTT S10

Radeon R9 280 vs MTT S10

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 and 2GB VRAM MTT S10 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
Boost Clock933MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
MTT S10 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 7 months late
Lower TDP (30W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280 +63%
3344
MTT S10
2048

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Oct 2023
Volcanic Islands
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

827 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
933 MHz
Boost Clock
0 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
8
-
SM Count
1792
Shading Units
1024
112
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
RT Cores
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
768 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

29.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
104.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
64.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.096 TFLOPS
3.344 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.048 TFLOPS
836.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
32.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

200W
TDP
30W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
Tahiti PRO3 (215-0821330)
GPU Variant
GCN 1.0
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
Unknown
352 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.4
-
CUDA
5.1
Shader Model
6.5
© 2025 - TopCPU.net