Radeon R9 280 vs P102 100
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 and 5GB VRAM P102 100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
Lower TDP (200W vs 250W)
P102 100 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 80% (1683MHz vs 933MHz)
More VRAM (5GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (440.3GB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280
3344
P102 100
+222%
10770
3DMark Time Spy
Radeon R9 280
2009
P102 100
+250%
7042
Graphics Card
Mar 2014
Release Date
Feb 2018
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4
Clock Speeds
827 MHz
Base Clock
1582 MHz
933 MHz
Boost Clock
1683 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1376 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5X
384bit
Memory Bus
320bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
440.3GB/s
Render Config
28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
25
1792
Shading Units
3200
112
TMUs
200
32
ROPs
80
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
0 MB
Theoretical Performance
29.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
134.6 GPixel/s
104.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
336.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
168.3 GFLOPS
3.344 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.77 TFLOPS
836.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
336.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
200W
TDP
250W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
2x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Tahiti
GPU Name
GP102
Tahiti PRO3
(215-0821330)
GPU Variant
GP102-100-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4