Home Comparison Radeon R9 280 vs Radeon HD 5770 Mac Edition

Radeon R9 280 vs Radeon HD 5770 Mac Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 5770 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock933MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 76.48GB/s)
992 additional rendering cores
Radeon HD 5770 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (108W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280 +145%
3344
Radeon HD 5770 Mac Edition
1360

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Jul 2010
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Evergreen
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

827 MHz
Base Clock
-
933 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1195 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
76.48GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
10
1792
Shading Units
800
112
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

29.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
13.60 GPixel/s
104.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.00 GTexel/s
3.344 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1360 GFLOPS
836.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

200W
TDP
108W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 2x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Juniper
Tahiti PRO3 (215-0821330)
GPU Variant
Juniper XT (215-0754013)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
1.04 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
166 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
5.1
Shader Model
5.0
© 2025 - TopCPU.net