Radeon R9 280 vs T1000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 and 4GB VRAM T1000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
T1000 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 50% (1395MHz vs 933MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (50W vs 200W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280
+33%
3344
T1000
2500
3DMark Time Spy
Radeon R9 280
2009
T1000
+52%
3073
Graphics Card
Mar 2014
Release Date
May 2021
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Quadro Turing
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
827 MHz
Base Clock
1065 MHz
933 MHz
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
1792
Shading Units
896
112
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
29.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.64 GPixel/s
104.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
78.12 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.000 TFLOPS
3.344 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.500 TFLOPS
836.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.12 GFLOPS
Board Design
200W
TDP
50W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
2x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Tahiti
GPU Name
TU117
Tahiti PRO3
(215-0821330)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
