Radeon R9 280 vs Tesla T10 16 GB
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 and 16GB VRAM Tesla T10 16 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Tesla T10 16 GB 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 50% (1395MHz vs 933MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (403.2GB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 200W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280
3344
Tesla T10 16 GB
+199%
9999
Graphics Card
Mar 2014
Release Date
Jan 2020
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Tesla Turing
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
827 MHz
Base Clock
1065 MHz
933 MHz
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1575 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
403.2GB/s
Render Config
28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
56
1792
Shading Units
3584
112
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
Theoretical Performance
29.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.28 GPixel/s
104.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
312.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
20.00 TFLOPS
3.344 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.999 TFLOPS
836.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
312.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
200W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
2x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Tahiti
GPU Name
TU102
Tahiti PRO3
(215-0821330)
GPU Variant
TU102-890-KCD-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.8