Radeon R9 295X2 vs FireMV 2250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 500W)
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 2014
Release Date
Jan 2007
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
44
Compute Units
-
2816
Shading Units
-
176
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
4
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
500W
TDP
32W
900 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x S-Video
1x DMS-59
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Vesuvius
GPU Name
RV516
Vesuvius XT
(215-0852022)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
6.3
Shader Model
3.0
