Radeon R9 295X2 vs FirePro 2270 PCIe x1
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 512MB VRAM FirePro 2270 PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
2736 additional rendering cores
FirePro 2270 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 295X2
+5871%
5733
FirePro 2270 PCIe x1
96
Graphics Card
Apr 2014
Release Date
Jan 2011
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1
Clock Speeds
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s
Render Config
44
Compute Units
1
2816
Shading Units
80
176
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
96.00 GFLOPS
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
500W
TDP
15W
900 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DMS-59
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Vesuvius
GPU Name
Cedar
Vesuvius XT
(215-0852022)
GPU Variant
Cedar WS
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
6.3
Shader Model
5.0
