Radeon R9 295X2 vs FirePro V3800
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
2416 additional rendering cores
FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 295X2
+1002%
5733
FirePro V3800
520
Graphics Card
Apr 2014
Release Date
Apr 2010
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
44
Compute Units
5
2816
Shading Units
400
176
TMUs
20
64
ROPs
8
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.00 GTexel/s
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
520.0 GFLOPS
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
500W
TDP
43W
900 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.1
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Vesuvius
GPU Name
Redwood
Vesuvius XT
(215-0852022)
GPU Variant
Redwood PRO GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
6.3
Shader Model
5.0
