Radeon R9 295X2 vs FirePro V5700
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 512MB VRAM FirePro V5700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
2496 additional rendering cores
FirePro V5700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (56W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 295X2
+1179%
5733
FirePro V5700
448
Graphics Card
Apr 2014
Release Date
Aug 2008
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
44
Compute Units
4
2816
Shading Units
320
176
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
8
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.600 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.40 GTexel/s
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
448.0 GFLOPS
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
500W
TDP
56W
900 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.0
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Vesuvius
GPU Name
RV730
Vesuvius XT
(215-0852022)
GPU Variant
RV730 XT
(215-0719047)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
6.3
Shader Model
4.1
