Radeon R9 295X2 vs FirePro V7760
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V7760 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 27.20GB/s)
2016 additional rendering cores
FirePro V7760 's Advantages
Lower TDP (76W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 295X2
+377%
5733
FirePro V7760
1200
Graphics Card
Apr 2014
Release Date
Jan 2012
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
27.20GB/s
Render Config
44
Compute Units
10
2816
Shading Units
800
176
TMUs
40
64
ROPs
8
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.000 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
500W
TDP
76W
900 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Vesuvius
GPU Name
RV770
Vesuvius XT
(215-0852022)
GPU Variant
RV770 XT
(215-0669049)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
6.3
Shader Model
4.1
