Radeon R9 295X2 vs GeForce 9300 GS Rev. 2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 256MB VRAM GeForce 9300 GS Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 5.328GB/s)
2800 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 295X2
+12929%
5733
GeForce 9300 GS Rev. 2
44
Graphics Card
Apr 2014
Release Date
Mar 2011
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
333 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
5.328GB/s
Render Config
44
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
2816
Shading Units
16
176
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.86 GFLOPS
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
500W
TDP
Unknown
900 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI
1x VGA
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Vesuvius
GPU Name
GT218S
Vesuvius XT
(215-0852022)
GPU Variant
GT218-670-B1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.3
Shader Model
4.1