Home Comparison Radeon R9 295X2 vs GeForce 9400 GT

Radeon R9 295X2 vs GeForce 9400 GT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 1 GB VRAM GeForce 9400 GT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
2800 additional rendering cores
GeForce 9400 GT 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 295X2 +19668%
5733
GeForce 9400 GT
29

Graphics Card

Apr 2014
Release Date
Aug 2008
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1250 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1 GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
2816
Shading Units
16
176
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB

Theoretical Performance

65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.836 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.672 GTexel/s
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
29.38 GFLOPS
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

500W
TDP
50W
900 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Vesuvius
GPU Name
G86S
Vesuvius XT (215-0852022)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.3
Shader Model
4.0
© 2025 - TopCPU.net