Radeon R9 295X2 vs GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 38.02GB/s)
2768 additional rendering cores
GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 295X2
+3881%
5733
GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition
144
Graphics Card
Apr 2014
Release Date
Dec 2008
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 100
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
792 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
192bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
38.02GB/s
Render Config
44
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
2816
Shading Units
48
176
TMUs
24
64
ROPs
12
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
48 KB
Theoretical Performance
65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.200 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
14.40 GTexel/s
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
144.0 GFLOPS
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
500W
TDP
75W
900 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Vesuvius
GPU Name
G94B
Vesuvius XT
(215-0852022)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
196 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.3
Shader Model
4.0
