Radeon R9 295X2 vs GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
Lower TDP (80W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 295X2
+101%
5733
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
2849
Graphics Card
Apr 2014
Release Date
Jul 2020
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
44
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
2816
Shading Units
896
176
TMUs
56
64
ROPs
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
80W
900 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Vesuvius
GPU Name
TU116
Vesuvius XT
(215-0852022)
GPU Variant
TU116-150-KA-A1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.3
Shader Model
6.6
