Radeon R9 295X2 vs GeForce GTX 465
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 465 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 102.7GB/s)
2464 additional rendering cores
GeForce GTX 465 's Advantages
Lower TDP (200W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 295X2
+570%
5733
GeForce GTX 465
855
Graphics Card
Apr 2014
Release Date
May 2010
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
802 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
102.7GB/s
Render Config
44
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
11
2816
Shading Units
352
176
TMUs
44
64
ROPs
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
13.38 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.75 GTexel/s
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
855.4 GFLOPS
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
106.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
200W
900 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Vesuvius
GPU Name
GF100
Vesuvius XT
(215-0852022)
GPU Variant
GF100-030-A3
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
6.3
Shader Model
5.1
