Radeon R9 295X2 vs GeForce RTX 2060 TU104
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2060 TU104 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
896 additional rendering cores
GeForce RTX 2060 TU104 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1680MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (160W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 295X2
5733
GeForce RTX 2060 TU104
+12%
6451
Graphics Card
Apr 2014
Release Date
Jan 2020
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 20
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1365 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1680 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
192bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s
Render Config
44
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
2816
Shading Units
1920
176
TMUs
120
64
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
240
-
RT Cores
30
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
Theoretical Performance
65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
80.64 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
201.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.90 TFLOPS
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.451 TFLOPS
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
201.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
160W
900 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Vesuvius
GPU Name
TU104
Vesuvius XT
(215-0852022)
GPU Variant
TU104-150-KC-A1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.3
Shader Model
6.6
