Radeon R9 295X2 vs GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
256 additional rendering cores
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (215W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 295X2
5733
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
+58%
9062
Graphics Card
Apr 2014
Release Date
Jul 2019
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 20
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1605 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
44
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
40
2816
Shading Units
2560
176
TMUs
160
64
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
320
-
RT Cores
40
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
113.3 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
283.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
18.12 TFLOPS
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.062 TFLOPS
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
283.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
215W
900 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Vesuvius
GPU Name
TU104
Vesuvius XT
(215-0852022)
GPU Variant
TU104-410-A1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.3
Shader Model
6.6