Radeon R9 295X2 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 288.0GB/s)
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Boost Clock2535MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
1536 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (160W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 295X2
5733
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104
+284%
22060
Graphics Card
Apr 2014
Release Date
Apr 2024
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2310 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2535 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s
Render Config
44
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
34
2816
Shading Units
4352
176
TMUs
136
64
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
136
-
RT Cores
34
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 MB
Theoretical Performance
65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
121.7 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
344.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.06 TFLOPS
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.06 TFLOPS
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
344.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
160W
900 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
Vesuvius
GPU Name
AD104
Vesuvius XT
(215-0852022)
GPU Variant
AD104-150-K1-A1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.3
Shader Model
6.7