Radeon R9 295X2 vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2610MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.3GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
5632 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (285W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 295X2
5733
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102
+669%
44100
Graphics Card
Apr 2014
Release Date
Jun 2024
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2340 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2610 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1313 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6X
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
672.3GB/s
Render Config
44
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
66
2816
Shading Units
8448
176
TMUs
264
64
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
264
-
RT Cores
66
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
Theoretical Performance
65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
250.6 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
689.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
44.10 TFLOPS
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.10 TFLOPS
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
689.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
285W
900 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
Vesuvius
GPU Name
AD102
Vesuvius XT
(215-0852022)
GPU Variant
AD102-175-KEF-A1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.3
Shader Model
6.8
