Radeon R9 295X2 vs MTT S80
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 16GB VRAM MTT S80 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
MTT S80 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (255W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 295X2
5733
MTT S80
+157%
14750
Graphics Card
Apr 2014
Release Date
Oct 2023
Volcanic Islands
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1800 MHz
-
Boost Clock
0 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
44
Compute Units
32
-
SM Count
2816
Shading Units
4096
176
TMUs
256
64
ROPs
256
-
Tensor Cores
-
RT Cores
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
460.8 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
460.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
230.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
255W
900 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Vesuvius
GPU Name
MTT Gen 2
Vesuvius XT
(215-0852022)
GPU Variant
GCN 2.0
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
22 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.4
-
CUDA
6.3
Shader Model
6.5
