Radeon R9 295X2 vs NVS 315
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 1024MB VRAM NVS 315 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
2768 additional rendering cores
NVS 315 's Advantages
Lower TDP (19W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 295X2
+5633%
5733
NVS 315
100
Graphics Card
Apr 2014
Release Date
Mar 2013
Volcanic Islands
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s
Render Config
44
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
2816
Shading Units
48
176
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
19W
900 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DMS-59
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Vesuvius
GPU Name
GF119
Vesuvius XT
(215-0852022)
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.3
Shader Model
5.1