Radeon R9 295X2 vs Radeon Pro W5700
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro W5700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
512 additional rendering cores
Radeon Pro W5700 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1880MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (205W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 295X2
5733
Radeon Pro W5700
+51%
8663
Graphics Card
Apr 2014
Release Date
Nov 2019
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1400 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1880 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
44
Compute Units
36
2816
Shading Units
2304
176
TMUs
144
64
ROPs
64
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
120.3 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
270.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
17.33 TFLOPS
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.663 TFLOPS
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
541.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
205W
900 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
5x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Vesuvius
GPU Name
Navi 10
Vesuvius XT
(215-0852022)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
10.3 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
251 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
6.3
Shader Model
6.5
